What’s the point of federation, when we will end up having large clumps of users in specific communites under instances, where the owners of the instance can censor information, and enforce their political ideological false authory over everyone. If somebody doesn’t agree they can be banned without any valid reason. Federation is censorship resistant only to large government entities. We fail to realise that the issue with censorship is the owners and admins.

And yes, we can meke new instances that support our beliefs and that doesnt censor our speech, but then again we dont have an evenly distributed userbase. Having duplicate communities is cojnter intuitive anyways because it will confuse users. Lemmy is a failed project in my eyes unless they find a way to resolve these issues somehow.

Bad example but if i start a torrent, then the people who seed will own just as much of the torrent as i do. I’ll be equal with the peers without any upper hand. It cant be taken down or censored. Thats the idea i had.

  • mlsus
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    it’s way better than just full on centralization, though

    • user@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      Slightly better. You end up having the same kind of controlled enviroment but with stuff all over the place, having to explain the workings of the fediverse for every new user, to not get them confused.

      • PsychoticBananaSplit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Just about anyone commenting on a subreddit is aware of a mod’s authority and powertrips. It’s not hard to grasp that lemmy is moderated as well.