To me this just illustrates that using tests meant for humans to test AIs produces questionable results.
Of course an AI is going to be able to produce a larger number of original ideas, it’s designed to have much more data at its disposal than humans and be much better at using it, and correspondingly with access to more data it can produce more unique combinations from that data.
If anything, the fact that it’s simply near the top of the pack rather than massively outstripping human minds, which are essentially hunks of wet meat with a slight electrical charge, demonstrates how far this technology has yet to go.
To me this just illustrates that using tests meant for humans to test AIs produces questionable results.
Of course an AI is going to be able to produce a larger number of original ideas, it’s designed to have much more data at its disposal than humans and be much better at using it, and correspondingly with access to more data it can produce more unique combinations from that data.
If anything, the fact that it’s simply near the top of the pack rather than massively outstripping human minds, which are essentially hunks of wet meat with a slight electrical charge, demonstrates how far this technology has yet to go.