Jesus died at 33, so that can’t get returned in the query response lol

  • V0lD@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Why strictly less than 30 and greater or equal 25? (25 ≤ X < 30)

    Shouldnt it be strictly less and strictly more (25 < X < 30)?

    • Skua@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I guess you could argue that people we refer to as “25 years old” are actually 25 years and some days/hours/minutes/whatever old, therefore more than 25. People referred to as 30 are, in the same vein, more than 30

    • schmidtster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Well if you’re 25 and a day, that would mean you wouldn’t be able to fit any definition. The second after you turn 25 you would be “over 25” and could be included in 25, over 25 and between 25 and X until you turn 26 and the same repeats.

      • V0lD@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Even if you’re 25 and 11 months, you should still be counted as 25. Same way it should be for other age based restrictions

        • schmidtster@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          But you’re not 25, you’re 25 and 11 months you can’t have your cake and eat it too.

          If it’s the same way for other age base restrictions, you are now contradicting your original comments point… it’s between 25 to 30, so 25, 25 and a day, and 25 and 364 days would all be included.

          • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Unrelated question but why can’t one have a cake and eat it? Presumably that’s why you’d own a cake in the first place. Or is world filled with people eating other people’s cakes but no owner is ever allowed to. Such a mysterious saying…

            • DABDA@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              The easiest way to parse the meaning is to reverse the statement order, i.e. “Can’t eat your cake and have it too.” If you ate it, you wouldn’t have it. If you have it, you haven’t eaten it. The two states are mutually exclusive.

                • DABDA@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Totally agree. I’ve never been a fan of the saying and it only clicked properly for me when I heard it explained with the statement reversal.

            • schmidtster@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m an adult and go just drive and buy a cake anytime I want. I think it comes from you buy a cake to share, you are supposed to buy “a slice/piece” for yourself?

            • Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              That phrase is about fancy cakes, like wedding cake art. You can’t keep the art and eat the cake. Like the food network cake competitions, some of those things are super creative, but you can’t have the art and eat the cake.

              It’s like painting custom wrapping paper, or printing on toilet paper. If the purpose of something is to be consumed or destroyed, it can’t do that and look good at the same time. You have to choose between having pretty mocha art and drinking a mocha.

          • V0lD@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m not contradicting anything. I think someone who’s 25 years and 11 months should not be returned from the query. Hence, the strict inequality

            • schmidtster@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              But you absolutely are contradicting yourself……

              they are between the ages of 25 and 30 meaning your information would be incorrect or wrong… and it’s not even a debate since they are in fact between he age range.

              It’s like saying 25.2 isn’t part of 25, and that’s not up for debate, and if it is well you’re not here to discuss in good faith now are you?

              • V0lD@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Okay, since you’re starting to throw insults via this angle, let’s try to make my case via a different route

                Do you think the db is storing your age as an int or as a float? We know from the given information that it is stored as a singular number

                So, I’m assuming it’s as an int, which means that until you’re 26, you’re still 25. If you’re 25 and 11 months, that’s still 25 years old, and stored as such. The strict inequality should therefore not put it in the range 25 < X < 30

                • schmidtster@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  If it’s a singular number and not a rounded number. Which we could also assume here…. The number 25 would always be between 25 and 30, if you’re using rounded numbers, there is a possibility that 25 wouldn’t be between 25 and 30 since you would need to account for 24.5 and greater numbers rounded to it.

                  And with age, you never round up. So according to these well established rules over time. What could it be other than included in “between 25-30” unless it’s not age or a rounded number which you don’t do for age?

                  • V0lD@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    The number 25 would always be between 25 and 30

                    Okay, wait, what do you think the word “between” means?