• Lvxferre@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m aware of the ambiguity behind “minimalism”. My point is that they likely didn’t think on usage (“less clutter that requires your eyes to be off the road”), and instead were following the trend of minimalism being interpreted as removal for the sake of removal - that you see in other industries too.

    • Death_Equity@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      They had no real consideration of minimalism. They had a big touch screen and didn’t want to spend money on buttons. Minimalism was the justification as a matter of marketing.