• deweydecibel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    All of which is your work.

    They’re suggesting UBI in place of copyright. So all that work your doing right now could be stolen by others and sold for cheaper than you would sell it, without your permission. So companies like Disney can just take it and put it in a movie or something, without paying you.

    All you would get would be your UBI, they would get the profit.

    • winterayars
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      We should just do UBI anyway. Copyright is a whole fucked up world of nonsense, we don’t need to go there.

    • Kedly@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They are suggesting focussing on UBI instead of getting angry at AI art as a bandaid for capitalism taking artists jobs away, because, spoiler alert, capitalism is going to keep using advances in tech to take all of our well paying jobs away. One solution gives us all a way to live, the other stems the tide for a TINY bit for ONE category of workers