• mordack550@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Content-wise was the right middle ground. Not too long but the content was all real content and not ubisoft-like collectaton.

    • Damage@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It did feel like it was somewhat empty, not many side quests, but I guess that’s better than fetch quests and collectible crap. I think a cross between this and Mass Effect Andromeda would be quite good.

      • teft@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You have to poke around to find side quests in that game. There were about a dozen per world but if you don’t explore a lot you won’t find them.

    • ramblinguy
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Honestly from someone who has a backlog of hundreds of games, this is probably a plus. Too many games nowadays have filler that don’t add to the enjoyment of the game. Sometimes I might wish a game was longer, but longer in the areas I found enjoyable, not endless fetch quests

      • mordack550@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Me too. Just bought a Steam Deck recently and I’m playing a lot of games from the ps2 era… And I always find myself stuck to “complete every level with 5 stars” or “grab all collectibles” instead of focusing on good content (or just clearing the game normally to start emptying this backlog…)