For comparison, Gen X had 9% of the wealth, and Boomers had 21%. The largest generation in history did everything they were told, became the most educated generation, and now they’re the poorest.

Here are the official numbers from the fed for millennial wealth

Zuckerburg owns a very large amount of Facebook stock, and he sells it on a pre-determined, fixed, schedule. The current amount of stock he has is around $80 billion.

To find out how much he’s sold on what schedule, the easiest answer is Yahoo Meta, insider transactions: https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/META/insider-transactions?p=META

You can also look at the their 2022 proxy report official in Meta SEC filings https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1326801/000132680122000043/meta2022definitiveproxysta.htm

Zuckerburg has 93,675,733 vested shares, 831,706 class A shares, and 349,745,790 class B shares a total of 350,577,496 shares (we don’t care about voting rights, just valuation). At today’s market value, those shares are worth $296.73 each (October 30, 2023). We multiple those numbers together and get $104,026,860,388.08.

So, that rounds to $104 billion dollars in Meta stock.

Finally, he controls additional shares via Chan Zuckerberg foundation, Mark Zuckerberg Trust, and assorted other groups.

  • Kecessa
    41·
    1 year ago

    You just proved you don’t understand what you’re sharing. Zuckerberg is 2% of millennial’s wealth, not 2% of everyone’s wealth 😂 That’s 2% of 4.8%!

    I don’t pull the info because the burden of proof is on you.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOPM
      49·
      1 year ago

      You just proved you don’t understand what you’re sharing. Zuckerberg is 2% of millennial’s wealth, not 2% of everyone’s wealth 😂 That’s 2% of 4.8%!

      I was very clearly talking about millennial wealth there. Work on your reading comprehension.

      • Kecessa
        31·
        1 year ago

        It's pretty obvious though that it must've been a lot higher than 2.4% (which is the millennial wealth excluding Zucc)

        Were you? Because from the original post it’s 4.8% (4.4% based on the other numbers) and Zuckerberg represents 2% of millennial wealth, not 2% of total wealth, which means 4.8% - (2% x 4.8%) = 4.704% or 4.4% - (2% x 4.4%) = 4.312%

        Zuckerberg doesn’t own 40%+ of all of millennial’s wealth which is what you implied by saying that millennials without Zuckerberg = 2.4% (4.4 - 2) of total wealth 🙄

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOPM
          310·
          1 year ago

          Yeah I was, hence why you should spend more time working on your reading comprehension to make your trolling more convincing

          Zucc single handedly owns around half the millennial wealth

          • Kecessa
            31·
            1 year ago

            US total household wealth: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-fed-wealth/u-s-households-ended-2020-with-record-130-2-trillion-in-wealth-fed-says-idUSKBN2B32H5

            130T

            4.4% of that is 5.72T

            So you’re saying that Zuckerberg owns close to 3T in wealth? Making him the richest person in the world by an order of magnitude? That’s what you’re saying?

            Man… You should tell Bloomberg!

            https://www.bloomberg.com/billionaires/profiles/mark-e-zuckerberg/

            Maybe YOU should work on your reading comprehension. 110B out of 5.7T? Look at that, about 2%!

            • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOPM
              39·
              1 year ago

              oh look the troll finally pulls up some numbers 👏

              All depends on how you actually count the wealth doesn’t it. American households carry a total of $17.1 trillion in debt as of the second quarter of 2023, and the average household debt is $101,915 as of the end of 2022. https://www.fool.com/the-ascent/research/average-household-debt/

              So, that’s a bit at odds with your 130T figure in household wealth there. Can’t both be 100k in debt and have wealth at the same time. But maybe it’s that new math they tech you kids in school nowadays.

              • Kecessa
                31·
                1 year ago

                The 130T is backed by your own source.

                Wealth includes possessions, you can be 100k in debt and still own a house worth 1m, you own 900k in total wealth, you’re still indebted.

                Maybe you didn’t get economy classes in school 🤔

                Funny how I proved you don’t understand the numbers and you just tried to change the subject and you’re wrong again.

                • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOPM
                  310·
                  1 year ago

                  Wealth includes possessions, you can be 100k in debt and still own a house worth 1m, you own 900k in total wealth, you’re still indebted.

                  Unless you paid the mortgage off on your house, then it’s not wealth. It’s debt that you owe and the house is actually owned by the bank who will immediately repossess it when you stop making your payments. Zucc owns actual tangible wealth as opposed to having debt.

                  Funny how I proved you don’t understand the numbers and you just tried to change the subject and you’re wrong again.

                  Funny how you keep proving that either you don’t understand what wealth actually is or you’re just trolling. Hard to say which it is to be honest.