Except you’re wrong - which I’m sure you’re used to given the fact you’re defending Breitbart. Not that Huffpo or Salon being worse would have any impact on how braindead and propagandistic Breitbart is.
Is it still whataboutism or a fallacy to say mbc is biased in of itself? That (in my personal experience) leftists are more prone to feeling the need to make websites like that?
If you respond to “Breitbart is shit” with “but what about X, Y, Z”, then it is. But if for example the conversation instead started with “X, Y, Z is shit”, then it wouldn’t.
I agree with you that MBC, salon, and huffington are bad. (I disagree that they are worse), but that isn’t relevant to criticism of breitbart.
Sources: feels.
Except you’re wrong - which I’m sure you’re used to given the fact you’re defending Breitbart. Not that Huffpo or Salon being worse would have any impact on how braindead and propagandistic Breitbart is.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/breitbart/
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/huffington-post
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/salon
Removed by mod
I suppose you are nobody, and it certainly seems that you got triggered.
Congratulations - you somehow failed your way into making a correct statement. Enjoy this refreshing new experience.
Seriously, how many times? Rule 1, No r-slurs. 2 day ban.
Is it still whataboutism or a fallacy to say mbc is biased in of itself? That (in my personal experience) leftists are more prone to feeling the need to make websites like that?
It’s certainty predictable. Do you have a particular concern to share, or is this a feels thing?
It depends on the context of the conversation:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whataboutism
If you respond to “Breitbart is shit” with “but what about X, Y, Z”, then it is. But if for example the conversation instead started with “X, Y, Z is shit”, then it wouldn’t.
I agree with you that MBC, salon, and huffington are bad. (I disagree that they are worse), but that isn’t relevant to criticism of breitbart.