• WingedSeven@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 years ago

      it seems like it happens enough to be an acceptable alternate way of saying the cost of something; I see it a lot, including (in fact mostly) by native speakers

      • Demonen@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Languages evolve, or we’d all still be grunting the first sounds. “No, the other other rock. Damn, we should come up with more names for things!”

        • WingedSeven@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          judging by the votes, people seem to think we’re in disagreement, whereas i think you’re spot-on.

          • Demonen@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            This is the internet, people are not supposed to just agree on things. That would automatically be “echo chamber”, and bad. Consensus is specifically disallowed.

            XD

      • BrewJajaja@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        In my experience/opinion, native English speakers have a different set of grammatical errors compared to non-natives. Obviously there is an overlap.

  • strayce@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Because people keep their fridges too long. They need to be able to remote brick them when they want you to buy a new one.

  • Jay@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 years ago

    The worst part is the silly over priced fridges you buy probably won’t even last 10 years anymore. Sure they’re more efficient, but if you have to replace it every 10-15 years, is it really worth it? I’d sooner have a slightly less efficient fridge that I know will last than one that can show me ads and look fancy.

    • s_s@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      “More efficient”

      • has french doors,
      • has water dispenser,
      • has two seperate frozen zones (ice and freezer)
      • has main freezer on bottom

      No way this thing is anywhere near efficent.

        • TurretCorruption@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Having the main freezer on the bottom is insanely inefficient. Hot air rises, and cold air falls. When a freezer is on the top, all of the cold air is generated in that freezer, and then it falls through a channel into the main refrigeration area. It keeps both compartments cold using just one system.

          Freezer on the bottom requires either a separate cooling system for the main fridge, or a series of fans that constantly draw cold air upwards, wasting electricity in the process.

    • 3nt3r@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      Appliances these days are absolute junk. Nothing last more then like 7-10 years. My parents have a stainless steel kitchen aid fridge thats 20+ years old and works like a charm and a second shitty white fridge thats at least 15 years old by now. My aunt has gone through 2 samsung fridges in 10 years though

      • Jay@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Ya I just went through all that bullshit last year. my old fridge (maybe 15yrs) crapped out and the repair guy told me flat out that they typically don’t repair stuff like that anymore. Manufacturers make it intentionally difficult to obtain parts and even if you can get them, chances are they’ll crap out before too long. I ended up getting a new Danby. I hope it proves me wrong but…

      • DivineDingus@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        We had a KitchenAid fridge crap out and tried or damnedest to get it repaired. In the end, the repair tech said we could throw $1000 worth of parts at it and hope, or get a new fridge. This was our first matching set of appliances and my wife was not going back to slumming with an unmatched kitchen. Guess who had to spend 4K on a new fridge. We didn’t even get a touchscreen. I don’t expect this one to last either.

        • BrewJajaja@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          slumming with an unmatched kitchen

          Oof, very pedestrian logic (her, not you). Time to stop watching HGTV shows. She wasn’t aware that you could panel any fridge to match your cabinet doors?

          I admire your steadfast… patience.

        • 3nt3r@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          Sad thing is its not only refrigerators. Dishwashers, washers, and driers are all junk as well. My parents have had 2 dryers in the last 8 years and my aunt 3 in the last 10 with one of them being repaired like 10 times in 3 years because something was always breaking. Not sure if our family just has horrible luck with those things or if they really are just that crappy now

          • ccunix@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Our dishwasher recently died 2 months out of warranty. Repair cost was basically even with buying a new device of similar quality (on paper).

            Decided to repair because we have had a couple supposedly good dishwashers that were complete junk. At least this one I know actually washes dishes (not given for a modern dishwasher).

    • clonedhuman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Meanwhile, my grandmother had a fridge from the 1960s that still worked fine when she replaced it in 2013.

    • relevant_user_name@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Granted, this is just an anecdote, but I have several Samsung appliances; oven/stove, dishwasher, microwave, televisions, smart phone(okay, I guess those are technically an electronic), and I haven’t had any issues with them. They’ve served me well, even if I haven’t been the kindest to them.

      I guess the point I’m trying to make is “your mileage may vary.”

      • Petri@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        I got one Samsung TV for free for one reason or another – it never really worked properly because all its spyware shit kept tripping up on my custom DNS server.

          • rolaulten@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            There is no good reason to connect any tv to the internet. External devices, those can be connected. But to me the tv is just a big dumb screen.

            • Pankkake@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              I disagree; I find it useful to have apps like YouTube on my TV, it’s handy not having to plug in another device to watch content.

    • chickenwing@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      This. I worked in appliance sales for years and we constantly had issues with Samsung. Their ice makers are complete garbage.

      • ccunix@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        Their TVs are great, had 1 for more than 10 years and a second going on 6 and we’re really happy both.

        Can’t speak for anything else though.

        • Petri@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          True - their TV and monitors are good - I was talking specifically about their washing/drying/fridge.

      • cryptosporidium140@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        They have a reputation for not lasting very long. I’ve already been avoiding them for that reason, so when I see a $4000 Samsung fridge I’m like lol nope

  • laxe@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 years ago

    If you actually want a smart fridge then be aware that when the display breaks, they will charge you the price of a new fridge to replace it.

    I would consider the broken display to be a feature tho.

    • MrAegis@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      That “white board” on the fridge is an “app” that comes with it as a feature. Someone just used it to draw the surprised Pikachu face.
      It’s turned on, but you’re most likely right that it’s not cool because I bet they have the temperature dialed up all the way.

  • Eheran@lemmy.fmhy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    How efficient is it? For that price I would expect top values. But seeing those 2 doors (for whatever reason someone wants to waste space like that): I doubt it.

    • kenblu24@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      how does two doors make it less space efficient

      if anything, the freezer is more space efficient since there’s no drawer to take up space

      • s_s@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        More doors = more gaskets = more seams = more heat loss = less energy efficent

        • kenblu24@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          If it’s meant for daily use, then all of the coldness will just fall out when a door is opened anyways. Drawer and chest freezers are advantageous in this respect. This is also why fridges have drawers. I’ll bet you more doors has a negligible effect on energy efficiency…

          as for long-term storage, this nerd has something to say about that

          • Eheran@lemmy.fmhy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            What do you mean, “all the coldness will just fall out”? Do you mean the bit of cold air? That is only relevant when you"constantly" open the fridge, for 10 times per day or something that is less relevant. We can do the math if you want.

            The split door reduces both spacial and thermal efficiency. Both because of the extra gap. I also don’t see how it adds value compared to one big door, maybe you could explain the benefits?

  • sina@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    I think the idea of a smart fridge is not necessarily a bad one. However charging $3600 extra for a screen and a couple of cameras is ridiculous.