I don’t think many people understand that if they use Lemmy or kbin, they are posting to the fediverse. There are other platforms and will be more to come. Referring to a post on “Lemmy” or “kbin” is like saying you saw a post on your Windows or Mac computer.

We should be referring to it as…

  • I saw it on the fediverse.
  • Hey fediverse users
  • A thread on the fediverse

New terms may emerge but referring to the platform seems weird, almost ignorant.

edit: A better example is email. You wouldn’t assume everyone is on Hotmail because that is the email provider you use. You say I’m sendingan eamail, not I’m sending a Hotmail.

  • imaqtpieA
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    https://lemmy.world/comment/20357

    This comment was very helpful when I first joined. Long story short, each server is locally storing data for its own users and communities, and also for external communities that at least one user is subscribed to.

    Everything is either self or donor funded, and it is my understanding that this model can scale quite a bit without a crazy amount of donations.

    But if we get into instances with over a million users, I’m not sure when/if the donor funded model eventually breaks down. That’ll be a good problem to have though, because it means this platform will have been a massive success.

      • Cat@kbin.socialOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Bang links work for users on Kbin.

        If that is Lemmy creating the URL or kbin seeing the bang format and using it, I don’t know… off to find out :-)

        edit: experimenting here !kbin
        edit2: I think Lemmy is creating a regular link out of that. My bang above was not auto converted on kbin.

    • richard_wagner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Awesome, the comment you linked was super helpful. Thanks!

      To summarize for my own understanding:

      • the federation protocols (whatever they are) dictate that data is replicated across instances. So my data could be stored in multiple DBs. No one person owns it. (So I should be careful what I post 😅)
      • If my instance goes down, I won’t be able to use my account created on that instance
      • If another instance goes down, I’ll be able to read older posts from that instance, but maybe not newer ones since they won’t be reliably be replicated

      The main goal with the fediverse right now is traction, so we should just be focusing on using it as much as possible and figure out sustainability later.

      • imaqtpieA
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yup, that all seems right.

        Totally agree, once we have a strong, sustainable community in place, all of the theoretical issues can be fixed as they pop up. The flexibility of federation gives us a lot of options in terms of developing the platform. We don’t have to be locked into one vision or plan, different instances can create their own solutions and servers can learn from each other in terms of what seems to be working best.

        I get so excited every time I start talking about where this platform is headed 😊

    • bvanevery@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’ll be a good problem to have though, because it means this platform will have been a massive success.

      I dunno, could be a repeat of Eternal September.