Amazon execs destroyed years of evidence before FTC action, agency says::Amazon allegedly destroyed communications, turned controversial programs on and off, and knowingly raised prices for consumers, according to unsealed documents.

  • This is fine🔥🐶☕🔥@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    118
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Split Amazon into retail and web services and then further split them into multiple different companies. Amazon has gotten way too big and stifling competition along the way.

    Do the same to Facebook too while we’re at it. Fucking hate speech central.

    • Kecessa
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 year ago

      Amazon, meta, Google, Microsoft, Apple…

      • This is fine🔥🐶☕🔥@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Even though I’m not a fan of Apple, I am not sure how it could be split. Unlike other companies mentioned, Apple is firmly in consumer electronics business, except for Apple TV+ which is a recent addition.

        Their software products also exist to work only on specific hardware.

        Also, only today I figured out that they have their own office suite lol. Don’t know why I never thought about it before

        • LufyCZ@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          They are heavily vertically integrated, even if split, they’d still work together as one company, because they simply don’t have any other choice.

          There are many products all of these companies have that aren’t profitable (f.e. YouTube would either die or get enshitified to hell, can’t see Prime Music surviving without the rest of the Prime ecosystem etc.).

          Splitting most of these up would not help anyone.

          • This is fine🔥🐶☕🔥@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            There are many products all of these companies have that aren’t profitable

            Splitting most of these up would not help anyone.

            Good.

            Companies have been using their profitable ventures to get dominant (or even solo) position in another market segment by undercutting the competition and then degrade their services as there’s no other alternative for customers.

            This should force them (and customers) to reconsider their offerings and the pricing for it.

            • LufyCZ@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Everyone is complaining about services raising prices all the time. YouTube introducing anti-adblock tech has caused an uproar.

              Do you know why YouTube is dominant? It’s because it’s subsidized. Running a service like that is more expensive than you could ever imagine and it’s free, thanks to subsidization.

              I’m not saying Google’s a good company, but consider how much value YouTube has brought into the world - it’s not only entertainment, but also education.

              It wouldn’t survive on it’s own.

              Splitting up companies makes no sense. They could (and in 99% of cases still would) work together as one. Regulating them and holding them accountable does, much more. Why not start there, instead of wasting your time here?

              • LukeMedia@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                That’s one of the issues with these business models, it’s hard to give a consumer something and then take it away later to turn a profit (enshittification).

              • uis@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                It’s because it’s subsidized.

                Do you know why google is ad monopoly? Because they have all youtube info.

                • LufyCZ@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  There’s no way that’s true. It’s a piece of it for sure, but they are neither an ad monopoly or a monopoly dependent on YouTube info.

        • uis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Their streaming. Also split software development and hardware development.

    • EnderMB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They (technically) already are. I work for Amazon, but I don’t get paid by “Amazon”. I get paid for the subsidiary I work for.

      Splitting is fine, but it’s easily dealt with by megacorps. If anything, if the idea is floated, it’s probably because they’re absolutely fine with it.

      If you want to break Amazon apart, do the one thing they hate. Enable their employees to unionize, and empower them to fight the decades-long HR machine that ruins corporate employees lives.

    • jwagner7813@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Gotta go further and deeper then that too. There are other, larger and more diverse companies that are hiding in plain site behind the more popular business like Google, Amazon, Microsoft, etc…