• be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Windows would still be the only viable option for most PC gamers if not for the investment Valve has made in proton/wine. You can say it’s self-serving (steamdeck) and you would likely be right. But we have two (three if you count standard Linux desktops as distinct from steamdeck) viable PC gaming platforms thanks specifically to Valve.

    • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes. They sure did. Yet still, monopolies shouldn’t exist, even of sometimes something good comes out of it

    • hh93@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m sure the fact that that happened at the same time as Microsoft pushing their Game-Pass and their own Store is just by chance…

      don’t kid yourself and think that they did that just for the benefit of the users and not to be able to get games and users away from Microsoft if that’s necessary…

      • Dudewitbow@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The whole point of the conversation is that the other platforms arent doing any work for the consumer.

        To this day, epic doesnt even launch on linux officially, and requires a 3rd party launcher to even play its games. Epics first party games are on the list of games that dont work on linux.

        There’s clearly one company who puts more effort onto the consumer front than the other. Epic doesnt even need to make a custom OS like valve does, it just needs to get their own launcher working, and their own games working, which they dont and refuse to.

        To say that Epic is doing better for the consumer is disingenuous (however it does better for the developer though)

      • be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s as if you didn’t read what I wrote.

        You can say it’s self-serving (steamdeck) and you would likely be right.

        Doesn’t matter whose benefit it was for. It’s here now. I can use proton without Steam if I want to. If Valve goes full satan tomorrow, they still enabled viable PC gaming platforms where before there were none, and someone else can take the source and run with it.

        Lots of us refused to run Windows just for games even before the MS store. We made do with what we could get. Now we (mostly) don’t have to. Plus, people who were staying with Win solely due to gaming have a better chance of being able to ditch MS. Given where MS is headed in recent years, that’s a win for personal freedom.

        don’t kid yourself and think

        You are arguing with a point I haven’t made.