• RolyRamen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s exactly a DLC that Activision realised they could make people pay £70 for instead of half that. Only a few weeks after MW2 came out it was being floated that there was no COD for 2023, and instead a Ghost focused expansion would come out to fill the void.

    Don’t like it don’t buy it but FFS stop with faux shock and horror. COD is of the most aggressively monetised franchises in mainstream gaming, from a company with zero scruples. Facts that have been valid for a decade or more and the regular news cycle attached to it all gets tiring.

    Ignore the bugger and maybe they’ll be forced to do better next time when this sell’s poorer (you can hope at least). It’s not like this is some long awaited sequel either, just skip this one. There’s so much more to play this year in particular.

    • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      The achievements on Xbox and PS5 even show up as a DLC of MW2. I wonder how late in the development process did they realize that if they could sell almost the same game every year then they probably could literally sell the same game twice.

      • AZERTY@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        1 year ago

        They realized that in 2012 tbh. I haven’t purchased an MW game since (old) MW2 because I hated their practice of yearly releases while only adding incremental changes.

        • Bone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          It was a better package deal when Zombies was at its heyday. It was the only reason I got CODs, though I would play multi as well. Now that Zombies is a pile of steaming shit I have no reason to buy COD.

    • Bonskreeskreeskree@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Leading up to mw2 launch, they were repeatedly saying it was the first 2 year release. They said there would only be a paid dlc at the end of the year. A few weeks into launch they back pedeled and released a statement saying that wasn’t true. Something they could have done before launch, but didn’t, for sales. There are maps in mw3 that have been in the code of mw2 since launch andnwere never released. Fuck them.

    • Ear_of_Corn
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      My thoughts exactly, we live in a world where content creators have to make content on new releases to stay afloat. Never pre-order and VOTE WITH YOUR MONEY

    • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think this is also what happened with AC: Mirage. Ubi originally had planned it as DLC for Valhalla.

      At least they had the decency not to charge $70 for it, but still, it’s MBA businessthink in charge of AAA gaming right now. Unless people stop buying them, nothing changes.

      • eoddc5@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        At least - and I can’t believe i am defending Ubisoft - they released “hey this dlc, let’s make it bigger and better and into its own game”

    • Fades@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You don’t have to ignore it just don’t pay for shit. Sail the seas if you have to