• MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    It says “Commentary” right on top. That means it is a comment and not an analysis. So maybe just read the damn commentary, before starting to insult people.

    • Murvel@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      24
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wtf difference does thst make?! Do you think the facts and sources are nullified since it’s labeled a commentary?

      • MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        1 year ago

        The facts are basicly everything that happend in the past, as that can be measured. Everything about the future is just a comment from the author. It is not a study or a model, but just a comment from some reporter at Reuters.

        So if you actually care for the facts, it is that since Germany stopped its nuclear power plants Germany is producing less fossil fuel electricity. That graph comes straight from the Reuters piece. The question is if it continues that way and that is still open.

        • Murvel@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          And the Reuters article says it most likely won’t and will be substituted with fossil fuel! And by going by that argumentation, I’m surprised you’re not suggesting climate change is just speculation since it’s all based on models and predictions

          • MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            Again, can you read?

            It is not a study or a model, but just a comment from some reporter at Reuters.