Guess we have something to look forward to in 2028.

  • Wimopy@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Man who publicly restricts his freedom has his freedom publicly restricted.

    On a more serious note though: why is sharing his name and face necessary or even allowed? Seems like it’ll result in consequences greater than what the court has deemed appropriate to dole out.

    • livus@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      I agree. The UK is usually pretty robust about name suppression. Maybe he wasn’t powerful enough.

      The earlier story linked makes him sound vulnerable:

      Hunt also told the court on the two nights he had been seen on the side of the road he had wanted to kill himself by being hit by a car.

      “It never entered my head that what I was doing was frightening people,” he said.

      “I apologise to those people - I agree what I was doing was frightening but hand on my heart I never intended to cause them harassment, alarm or distress.”

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Man who publicly restricts his freedom has his freedom publicly restricted.

      Masochist tased, bondage enthusiast shackled.

    • mindbleach
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Jurisprudence Fetishist Gets Off On Technicality