Yeah, to each their own, half an hour of setup is something i can do myself.
Centralized password safes aren’t my favorite thing.
I just think that 2FA is such a must have feature, that it’s weird to put it behind a paywall, all that password-, file- or text-sharing or now passkeys are nice to have and should be paid.
They probably put 2FA behind a paywall because nobody in their right mind would actually want to store 2FA and their passwords behind one account in the same storage. I suppose you can see the problem.
If you’re talking about vaultwarden, that’s an unofficial project, so will take him time to map the client and add that in.
If you’re talking about the the regular paid Bitwarden server binaries, of course it will have support.
there is an official self hosted bitwarden server. It doesn’t support SSO, I guess time will tell if it supports this.
It’s bare minimum, not even 2FA is working without a premium account.
I was shocked how much more Vaultwarden is providing for free.
I mean Bitwarden wants to make money. 10$ a year to not have to mess about with self hosting (however beneficial that might be) is a pretty good deal.
Yeah, to each their own, half an hour of setup is something i can do myself. Centralized password safes aren’t my favorite thing.
I just think that 2FA is such a must have feature, that it’s weird to put it behind a paywall, all that password-, file- or text-sharing or now passkeys are nice to have and should be paid.
They probably put 2FA behind a paywall because nobody in their right mind would actually want to store 2FA and their passwords behind one account in the same storage. I suppose you can see the problem.
The official self-hosted Bitwarden server does support SSO.