• czech@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    113
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Meanwhile, In n Out serves a better burger, for less money, paying their workers $19+/hr.

    • DreamButt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, buuut in-n-out is also crazy religious so don’t put them on too high a pedestal

        • Sarmyth@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think there’s a lot of freedom in the various regions. I’m in coastal California, and they’ve not felt particularly religious for a while. Also, they were following all the protocols as they changed throughout. Where I am, they also start at $23/hour.

          If someone was banning masks, it’s probably more regional or nuanced than a company stance, unless in my area they were all unaddressed rebels.

          • Microplasticbrain@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            They did it in other states but couldn’t in California because of some state law. Innout is one of the few fast foods I still eat, they pay decent wages compared to their competitors, but they aren’t perfect. I think they still have bible verses on the bottom of cups.

            • Sarmyth@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Oh yeah, I almost forgot about the verses! It’s just the reference, though, and not the actual verse. It’s pretty passive as far as religious business practices go. If you did t already know what they were referencing, they’d look completely meaningless.

      • rifugee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Does the owner being religious effect whether or not they can pay a living wage and still make a profit? I personally don’t think so. I think the key difference is that the company is private.

        • Captain_Patchy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think the key difference is that the company is private.

          The magic answer! A private company is run by a C** and Board that are allowed to decide when it’s profitable enough and are not subject to the requirement of coming up with ANOTHER 15% MORE profit THAN last quarter, EVERY. SINGLE. QUARTER. Or be replaced by the shareholders.

  • Yote.zip@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    87
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is what being addicted to ever-growing profit looks like. They could still make mountains of profit with the new minimum wage, but they can’t make as much profit as they did before.

    • Obinice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      47
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If they aren’t increasing their profits every year endlessly, they’ll have to stop using that one clipart of the arrow line going up on a graph in their presentations.

      They sacked the guy that knew how to change the image years ago and they’re in too deep now to stop

      • Jelly_mcPB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        McDonald’s has 200,000 employees, and another 2 million that work for McDonald’s franchises. Thats 2,200,000 for every 100 million you took from the executives, you could give every employee a $45 bonus.

          • Jelly_mcPB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Fired, they would all be fired. If you dissolve a company, there is no more company. For every billion dollars, you are talking about 450 bucks. Per person. While there is certainly a lot of bloat, it would knew cap them to get rid of management. It would any company. I’m not saying there is no need for reform and change, but in lots of companies even local management gets stock options.

              • Jelly_mcPB@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                They have 200,000 actually employed by m Mc Donald’s and another 2,000,000 employed by McDonald’s franchises genius. Guess which ones are the workers most people see everyday.

              • Jelly_mcPB@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                And when they dissolve those options for a one time 10,000 dollar benefit, then what? You got exactly what your payout would be, as a single mom, with 2 kids in income tax, for one year, so what after that? You sound like a 15 year old kid that is terrified at getting their first job to help your parents pay for their phone, car, and insurance on said first car. There are 50 jobs that you would never need to worry about this in. Maybe you wouldnt need to worry about any of that nonsense. Maybe you can’t be an alternative artist that " arts" for 12 hours a week, but you can still make a livable wage off a trade, or a little higher learning.

                • flying_monkies@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  You really don’t understand what you’re talking about. Maybe you should actually read the link, do some research and apply some thought before you get offended for the poor corporation.

                  If you pulled your head from your fourth point of contact, you’d understand what a buyback is. Then you might do further research and notice that over the last four years, McDonald’s, on average, spends 3b/year on buybacks rather than spend the money on paying a decent wage for their employees.

                  Or, you can keep making shit up to fit your bullshit world view of “corporations great, every who works is just greedy”.

                  Pretty sure I already know the way you’ll go. I’ve given you a start for things to look at, it’s the best I can do for the youth of today.

  • nature_man@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    81
    ·
    1 year ago

    The prices were always gonna be raised, the wage increase is just an easy excuse, if the wage increase is reversed the prices will 100% still be raised and will almost definitely stay there.

      • nature_man@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Its not just labor they like to blame. I remember my local McDonald’s raised prices by around 10 cents across the board without giving a reason even though they had gotten a tax cut that year, next year the tax was raised to its previous value and they raised prices again, this time citing the “tax increase”. Corps will ALWAYS find a way to raise prices and blame it on something other than greed.

  • brygphilomena@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    74
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fox business coming through with a piece to say “we told you so” and “higher wages just mean higher prices.”

    Fuck Fox.

    • jaspersgroove@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      They won’t lower prices until people stop buying. And most Americans will happily spend themselves into the poorhouse in the name of convenience, and then blame the government for it, so…

  • moitoi@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is a misleading title.

    They hike the menu price to make more money using the minimum wage as an excuse.

  • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Let them price themselves out of business then. Someone will come along and make an affordable burger.

    • PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      “The free market will fix it” seldom works, which is why it’s still pushed as a solution.

      Could this hypothetical someone make a more affordable burger ethically, or would they also have to fuck over their employees and suppliers?

      Usually, the answer is “no”. Businesses either use all the same sleazy, “race to the bottom” techniques or they go out of business because they offered a more expensive product to people without the luxury of being able to spend more.

      But of course if you start paying people more, the billionaires will just fuck them out of that too. They want every dollar you have and they know people will spend every dollar they have to avoid being homeless or hungry.

        • PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          So am I, but that’s not what you were advocating.

          Without regulations, you won’t get “if you can’t ethically provide fast food then there will be no fast food”, you’ll just get another fast food company that’s even more unethical.

              • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                All I’m talking about is food prices and wages. If they raise their prices and their target audience stops going—then they will lower prices or go out of business.

                They are more than capable of keeping prices the same and paying more… they just get less profit.

                The company who says “we will pay more wages and keep our prices the same” will eventually be the “cheaper burger” and profit more by taking all of the business.

                This is the end of my participation. Good day.

  • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Large Fast Food Chains: We made record profits, again!

    Also Large Fast Food Chains: Wait! If we are required to actually pay our staff, how will I, Mr. CEO the Douchebag, afford my 16th yacht? How will I be able to send my children to the finest schools in the world? How will I be able to afford to eat if my workers aren’t suffering? Won’t anyone think of the 1% and our problems?

    • TheRedSpade@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      I doubt sales will change much. Most people who eat at McDonald’s do so because they’re addicted to it. Rising prices won’t stop them.

      • athos77@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        When I used to eat at McDonald’s, it was because I was working 3 jobs and it was a quick, cheap way to get something vaguely nutricious into my body en route between jobs. Because of understaffing , the delays to order, to pay, and to get your food mean it’s no longer fast; and it’s certainly no longer cheap. The only remaining advantage is the “en route between jobs” part, but it’s just easier to store a cooler in the car now.

      • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        I eat at McDonald’s because it’s cheap, it’s fast, and it’s reliably consistent. There are four or five different cheap fast food restaurants near the local McDonald’s. If they all raise their prices, it won’t be cheaper than a local restaurant burger, so the only advantage is time.

  • Rhoeri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I wonder if this will cause the Big Mac to shrink any more than it already has.

  • iBaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    The GOP will just blame it on Biden and all Trump’s cult followers will believe it.

  • qwertyWarlord@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    It literally doesn’t matter, fox. If it’s so bad, why hasn’t McD’s up and left the state? Why haven’t people stopped buying it? All the blather in the world isn’t bringing California down so go eat shit.

  • Squizzy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    They should also have to pay employment taxes on the automated ordering machines.