Is there a reason that only a moneyless society may be described as communist?
Is the distinction relevant, given that any abolition of money would entail gradual evolution by many smaller and weakly related changes, between the present and such a time?
Is communism not a movement based on the aspiration to achieve economic democracy?
The system I described is not moneyless
Is there a reason that only a moneyless society may be described as communist?
Is the distinction relevant, given that any abolition of money would entail gradual evolution by many smaller and weakly related changes, between the present and such a time?