J4g2F@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoCan't have to manylemmy.mlimagemessage-square9fedilinkarrow-up119arrow-down10
arrow-up119arrow-down1imageCan't have to manylemmy.mlJ4g2F@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square9fedilink
minus-squareFreeman@lemmy.publinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agoFor us it’s feet Pet feet cannot outnumber human feet, full stop. Otherwise you lose control and are no longer in charge. It’s a working theory but so far has been accurate.
minus-squarekenbw2@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoI see a couple of flaws Nobody who lives alone is allowed a pet If you have a toddler, in this rule that enables you to expand the number of pets, but I’d say a toddler adds to rather than eases the load
minus-squareGlyphicus@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoA person living on their own could have any number of fish, a single bird, any number of snakes, etc.
For us it’s feet
Pet feet cannot outnumber human feet, full stop. Otherwise you lose control and are no longer in charge.
It’s a working theory but so far has been accurate.
I see a couple of flaws
A person living on their own could have any number of fish, a single bird, any number of snakes, etc.