A Texas Republican city council candidate is facing felony child pornography charges after being arrested just hours before the elections.

Brad Benson, a candidate for Place #4 on the city council of Granbury, located just southwest of Fort Worth, was arrested on November 6. “I can confirm he was arrested by the District Attorney’s Office yesterday and charged with two felony child pornography charges, he should have a bond set today,” Hood County Sheriff Roger Deeds told Newsweek.

The Republican Party of Hood County (RPHC) withdrew its support for Benson after more details about the charges emerged.

  • HopeOfTheGunblade@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Arrest him when you’re ready to do the trial. Elections are not a “get out of being prosecuted free” deal. Why would they be? Why wouldn’t everyone who does a crime run for office, if they were?

    • mindbleach
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      He’s not being tried right away - that’s not how arrest works. And all concerns for impropriety and presumed innocence can be satisfied by waiting eight friggin’ hours.

      Or, again, busting his ass a month prior.

      • HopeOfTheGunblade@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        What if you don’t have the evidence a month prior? And why should the voters not know, if they have the evidence to prosecute eight hours beforehand?

        On what basis does an election affect arrest timing? Why should it have any more bearing on when the arrest happens than the number of moles on his ass?

        • mindbleach
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          … to prevent impropriety or the appearance of impropriety. Because the accused are supposed to enjoy a presumption of innocence, and law enforcement swinging elections is bad, actually.

          There’s a reason the FBI and DOJ have specific rules against this sort of timing, and I don’t need to remind you how things went when they broke them.

          • HopeOfTheGunblade@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Not prosecuting someone, when you have evidence, is also interference. The issue with the FBI announcement was that it was an announcement of an investigation, not an arrest of someone they were ready to prosecute.

            • mindbleach
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              “Not prosecuting someone” for eight additional hours is not justice denied. Fuck’s sake.

              The issue with the FBI announcement was that it was an announcement of an investigation, not an arrest of someone they were ready to prosecute.

              Just shout from the rooftops you don’t care about the presumption of innocence.