• sylver_dragon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      In fairness, yes. If we consider the perspective of the GOP as a legitimate attempt to balance budgets, tying foreign aid to cuts elsewhere in spending makes sense. Then reality shows up, taps us on the shoulder and we quickly discover that the GOP’s views on “balanced budgets” is actually just a smoke screen for “cut stuff we don’t like” and the whole argument falls apart.
      So ya, sticking with the “asinine” descriptor.

      • HubertManne@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        well you can also balance budgets by raising taxes or even just collecting income, investment, and corporate taxes equally and having tiers that don’t cap at six figures.

        • sylver_dragon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          BUT THAT’S SOCIALISM!!!11!1one!1!

          /s in case it wasn’t blindingly obvious.

          In seriousness, just rolling back the Bush era tax cuts would provide a huge boost to Federal Government revenue. There are a lot of other possible options, as well, which could raise revenue. But, the GOP never met a tax cut they didn’t like and a tax increase they didn’t hate.

      • Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Balancing the budget implies funding the IRS. Very few government investments have a higher return than tax audits.