jockyrickyrock@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 年前Facebook Finally Puts a Price on Privacy: It’s $10 a Monthwww.wired.comexternal-linkmessage-square34fedilinkarrow-up1232arrow-down137cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1195arrow-down1external-linkFacebook Finally Puts a Price on Privacy: It’s $10 a Monthwww.wired.comjockyrickyrock@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 年前message-square34fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
minus-squaresic_semper_tyrannis@feddit.chlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up76·1 年前A pay-to-see-no-ads is not the same as pay-for-privacy.
minus-square𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒊𝒆𝒍@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down1·1 年前They do point out they won’t use your personal info in ads if you pay, by choosing the free option you consent for personalized ads
minus-squaresic_semper_tyrannis@feddit.chlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up25·1 年前Doesn’t mean they won’t collect your info anyways. What has Meta done to prove that they are worthy of our trust? Nothing.
minus-squarenull@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 年前It pretty much makes it clear that they are absolutely going to continue collecting your data – they just won’t use it for ads. They wouldn’t have needed to specify that otherwise.
minus-squareDacoTaco@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·1 年前Like the personal ads is the only issue :')
A pay-to-see-no-ads is not the same as pay-for-privacy.
They do point out they won’t use your personal info in ads if you pay, by choosing the free option you consent for personalized ads
Doesn’t mean they won’t collect your info anyways. What has Meta done to prove that they are worthy of our trust? Nothing.
It pretty much makes it clear that they are absolutely going to continue collecting your data – they just won’t use it for ads. They wouldn’t have needed to specify that otherwise.
Like the personal ads is the only issue :')