• casiwo1945@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    When you look at the best offerings of the two companies, AMD is offering their 96 core 3d v cache EPYC at almost a third less price than Intel’s 56 core sapphire rapids, and everything starts to make sense

    • jaaval@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Then you realize few customers actually buy either of those. Most sales are in the ~30ish core products. And it starts to make sense why AMD doesn’t just capture the entire market but is still sitting at 25% even though the 96 core chip is so great.

    • soggybiscuit93@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The problem with this line of reasoning is that we don’t buy CPUs in datacenter - we buy full servers from 3rd party suppliers. Look at a company such as CDW.

      Most server customers aren’t massive hyperscalers that need to maximize computer per rack-U. Xeon servers are plentiful, can be found for cheaper than their CPU MSRP’s would suggest, and if we’re looking for a 16 - 24 core model to spin up a branch office, a lot of times we don’t even really care whether it’s SPR or Epyc. There’re other factors like “Is my LOB app certified by the vendor to run on Epyc”? etc.

      A lot of times, when I need to order, a lot of the Epyc servers may be on backorder, or may be comparable pricing, or maybe I specifically need Xeon because I already have a Xeon Hyper-V server and want this server to be able to work in the event of a failover (best to keep your VMs on the same platform).

      Hell, in Windows Server, Epyc only got support for nested virtualization with Server 2022, so it wasn’t even a consideration when we did a big refresh a few years back.