• BarqsHasBite@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I listened to the podcast opening arguments (759) and the guest said they picked charges that can be proven without Trump trying to spin them.

    Also they are federal charges and it’s a federal case, even if the court is physically in Florida.

    • L. Rhodes@beehaw.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I didn’t mean to imply that they’d be state charges. Federal charges have to have a venue, and venue is generally chosen based on where the crime took place. These would be in a different venue because the crime arguably took place in New Jersey rather than Florida.

      • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Wasn’t the wilful retention in Florida? And if they’re interconnected, maybe they just bundled it together.

        • L. Rhodes@beehaw.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It was. But dissemination wasn’t one of the charges in the Florida indictment, which suggests that they’re either not going to charge him with dissemination, or they’re holding off on those charges for now.

  • Tin@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s possible. My impression is that from the audio alone, it’s not clear that he allowed others to actually read the documents. He seems to be showing them to others, but it’d be difficult to prove from the audio alone.

    What is clear, however, is that he knew he had the documents, he knew they were classified, he knew he had not declassified them, and he knew that he couldn’t do it anymore. He lied repeatedly about these things, and to my knowledge, that’s the crux of the case against him. I’m certainly no legal expert, though.

    • L. Rhodes@beehaw.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I imagine that having the other parties testify about what he showed them, couple with the audio, would suffice to establish dissemination. It’s not clear to me that he would even have to show them. If the audio has him revealing info from those documents, such as the number of troops called for in the attack plan, that may be enough for a guilty charge.

  • frogman@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    how are you guys reading this; does everyone have a subscription to The Atlantic or do you have some sort of content blocker to bypass the “subscribe to continue reading this article”?