• Holyginz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can anyone working in legal weigh in on this? I don’t know enough to know if this is a good idea or a bad one.

    • Tangled Slinky@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well, it removes some pretty heavy financial obstacles for the profession and will allow a broader diversity of people to enter the field. Plus, anyone who has ever been to law school will tell you that it doesn’t teach you dick diddly about practicing law. Serving as a clerk/intern/junior associate is where you really cut your teeth. Some jurisdictions even have restrictions on your ability to practice on your own if you haven’t observed or participated in different types of legal matters. To that end, I think it’s terrific that this program has a fairly strong practical requirement.

      The bar is a way to show that you can at least think like an attorney in a variety of fields. That thought process is applied differently based on where you practice. I can’t get out of my own speeding ticket, but I can breeze through your average regulatory exam for my industry. I can do that because I’ve spent time in a few different disciplines within the legal field. I’m not sure if 16 weeks is necessarily a substitute for the exam, but that’s more time than I spent studying for it.

      Source: I’m a lawyer, and my uncle works for Nintendo.

      • Holyginz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Thank you for the information! I had a feeling this was good i just wanted to get input from someone involved in the field before forming any conclusions.