It’s also a good thing to note that Canada doesn’t have the same concept of freedom of speech as the US has. Here you can be liable for damages caused by what you say.
Technically he didn’t say anything in a public forum tho. The article states he was briefed on the storefront by someone else, and seeing as it seems to fall under classified info it’s unlikely we will ever find out who that someone is.
based on the comments some say that they can’t sue but I would disagree
If Tutanota is an unwilling participant than this violates the principles of consent, copyright, and penetration testing
Tutanota lawyers might want to take a look as they might have a case.
btw I AM NOT A LAWYER, please ask a real lawyer for legal advice
again I AM NOT A LAWYER
It’s also a good thing to note that Canada doesn’t have the same concept of freedom of speech as the US has. Here you can be liable for damages caused by what you say.
Technically he didn’t say anything in a public forum tho. The article states he was briefed on the storefront by someone else, and seeing as it seems to fall under classified info it’s unlikely we will ever find out who that someone is.