J.D. Vance, the junior U.S. senator from Ohio, zeroed in on this in a social media post on Wednesday: “We’ve spent so much time winning a legal argument on abortion that we’ve fallen behind on the moral argument,” he wrote.

Vance is right.

  • MomoTimeToDie
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    “harm” is a question of value. The fact you pretend otherwise means your either too stupid or too dishonest to be worth talking to further.

    • PizzaMan@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      “harm” is a question of value

      No it isn’t, it’s objectively measurable. If you lose 3L of blood, the harms associated can be objectively measured. If you lose a limb, the harms are objectively measurable. If you smoke a pack a day, the decrease in your lifespan is objectively measurable.

      What the fuck are you talking about.

        • PizzaMan@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Clearly I thought to highly of a rat like you.

          Jesus you’re a stupid sack of shit.

          You need to take a look in the mirror if you can’t go two seconds without resorting to ad hominems.

          If there is a stupid sack of shit rat among the two of us, it clearly isn’t me.

          “harm” is fundamentally a subjective concept.

          In the same way septic tanks “subjectively” smell bad. Get a grip and learn to care about something other than semantics.