Rozaŭtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 年前More like guidelineslemmy.worldimagemessage-square32fedilinkarrow-up1460arrow-down118cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1442arrow-down1imageMore like guidelineslemmy.worldRozaŭtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 年前message-square32fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squarelowleveldata@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 年前 zero weight were easily observable how?
minus-squaretigeruppercut@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up29arrow-down1·1 年前People looked at yo mama and could immediately conceive of the opposite
minus-squarelowleveldata@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·edit-21 年前 conceive of the opposite Meh I don’t believe that they could avoid overshooting to negative weight
minus-square_danny@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·1 年前How much water, by weight, is in an empty cup? Round to the nearest amount an average 17th century merchant could identify.
minus-squareBillyTheSkidMark@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 年前I guess in terms of an actual weightless object… Not… But if you have 2 equal weight items, call their combined weight 1 weight unit, take one away, that’s half a weight unit, take two away, that’s zero weight units.
how?
People looked at yo mama and could immediately conceive of the opposite
Meh I don’t believe that they could avoid overshooting to negative weight
How much water, by weight, is in an empty cup? Round to the nearest amount an average 17th century merchant could identify.
I guess in terms of an actual weightless object… Not… But if you have 2 equal weight items, call their combined weight 1 weight unit, take one away, that’s half a weight unit, take two away, that’s zero weight units.
Removed by mod
Removed by mod