Tried it with 5 adults around me, 5 for 5 it was accurate. Most that agreed it was art had the stipulation that it looked like Children’s art, but that still was technically art even if they didn’t think it required much skill.
I never understood the is it art debate. Anything can be art. Whether or not it’s good art is a totally different question and is subjective and up to debate.
Didn’t work for me - looks like a kids crappy scribbles to me (fine to tell the kid it looks good, but I would never seriously call it art) and I’m a socialist with liberal social leanings.
I don’t think the Mona Lisa is very good but it’s still art.
I still wouldn’t call this art - I mean, it’s all subjective so if you want to call it art that’s fine with me. I was just pointing out that the weird little correlation the article was drawing didn’t pertain to me. Which doesn’t make it wrong, I was just sharing.
Out of curiosity, how would you define art?
Honestly - I wouldn’t. I think it’s up to each individual to determine what is and isn’t art.
