• qwertyqwerty4567@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Im honestly surprised they went with the stupid OLED name instead of just calling it the SD2/23. Its basically a completely new device that just has the same outer shell as the old one.

    • walktexranga@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s a refresh not a new generation. It is not the steam deck 2 they are waiting for a powerful/efficient enough APU… Nothing hits the mark yet. Look at the Ally battery life… Woeful.

    • OutrageousDress@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s almost the exact same performance profile - calling it a Deck 2 would be borderline consumer fraud. But more importantly, Valve want to be very consistent in their communication with developers: just like a console, all Steam Decks are designed to be almost interchangeable from a developer perspective, with only slight differences at most. When Valve release a device that developers need to target differently from the current Deck, that will be the Deck 2.

      • qwertyqwerty4567@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        There is a bigger gap in performance between the deck & deck oled than intel’s 12-14th gen processors, yet no one is calling the 14th gen the 12th gen++.

        There is absolutely no fraud and claiming it is is batshit crazy to me. There is no arbitrary definition of how much improvement is enough to “justify” calling it a new generation. The standard for most companies is to release a new product every year and call it the old +1, regardless of how much difference there is.