I tried to make it fairly realistic. Obviously I would like HSR absolutely everywhere, but a line through middle of nowhere Montana probably would not see much ridership and would come at extreme cost (especially in the mountains).

  • aion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Maybe Seattle->Spokane, Spokane->Boise->SLC->Denver, Spokane->Minneapolis.

    I think there also needs to be more in Canada, Vancouver->Calgary->Winnipeg->Toronto.

    • slicedcheesegremlin@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I was just thinking this too, having to go all the way to LA from Washington before the rest of the country is weird, and anyone who lives in the west is screwed over by this map.

    • Album@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Transit shouldn’t be profitable… But the cost to build an HSR rail (which costs more than traditional rail) that went that distance vs ridership that a Vancouver to Toronto line would see to recoup some of that cost would make it a really tough sell to tax payers.

      It’s different in the US with 10x population.