• TheEmpireStrikesDak@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    He started this whole crap show. Because he was scared of losing votes to UKIP, he held that dumb referendum, and that set in motion the events that led to Cruella (Johnson in power purging anyone in the party who didn’t bow down to his brexit ideology). Cameron can do one, he’s worse than Johnson in my eyes.

    • Hyperreality@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      The government is effectively acting like it’s the opposition, while the opposition is acting like it’s in government.

      The whole thing’s a shit show.

      TBF I left the UK years ago, and find the country increasingly alien as the years go by. Like a mirror universe country replaced the one I used to know.

    • Nighed@sffa.community
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      He wasn’t intentionally bad though, he just made a (huge) miscalculation about how much the leave campaign were willing to lie.

      • 520@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        A lot of people were making the same miscalculation. You have to remember this was around the same time as Donald Trump’s presidential campaign. It wasn’t widely known just how powerful that tactic really was yet. A lot of people were laughing at the obvious bullshit, confident that it’ll never fly, but were oblivious as to just how many were buying into it.

      • brewery@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Why did he leave then straight away and dissappear from public life? He’s completely arrogant and only cares about power. Why didn’t he have a plan is it did go wrong? He’s grossly incompetent. Any half decent government should prepare plans for even unlikely situations if they are possible and would cause so much damage.

        • Nighed@sffa.community
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          To be fair, having a pro remain leader in charge of Brexit would have pissed of the Brexit crowd. Probably would have given a better outcome though.

          • brewery@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            If he came out and said he will follow the will of the people and appoint a pro brexit person to lead a new dept and also lead negotiations, I think he could’ve got away with it. At least he could’ve seen through a transition to a new govt rather than just abandon it everything.

            Maybe he shouldn’t have pissed off the brexit crowd with those govt paid leaflets and the support he gave. He should’ve planned something for what would happen if the vote didn’t go his way. We could’ve at least figured out what type of brexit the country wanted as a binary yes - no was not enough.

            I see what you mean though, maybe it was just never possible and it was his only option. I just think he caused the most damage to this country ever and somehow is getting away with it with seemingly no consequences. No matter what, he is so linked to this situation in a negative way he should not be in politics anymore, either as a cabinet member or lord

        • FishFace@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          No matter what he wanted it probably would’ve gone worse for him to have remained. Can you imagine what the ERG would have attempted had he stayed? They only just about let May get in.

            • FishFace@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Why not? Enough time has passed now that the aftermath, or at least the immediate aftermath, has all been handled.

      • jamrom@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        He was a Eurosceptic masquerading as a pro-EU campaigner. He gambled his power with different referenda (AV in 2011, Scottish independence in 2014, and the UK self-sanction in 2016).

        He looks competent, but he’s directly and indirectly caused so much harm to this country.

        • HeartyBeast@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          He was a Eurosceptic masquerading as a pro-EU campaigner

          I don’t think there’s much evidence that suggests that. What he was, was complacent about Remain’s chances of success - and he wasnt the only one.

      • TheEmpireStrikesDak@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It was intentionally bad. It was party over country, as usual for the Tories. And then he did a runner when he lost. Filthy piece of toerag, he’s got a nerve showing his face in government again.

        • Nighed@sffa.community
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m not sure that calling a referendum to let the voters choose can be considered bad. (The result was though)