It’s just despicable playing these precious little rhetorical games while using historical deaths (and one or two inventions) as props for your atrocity propaganda, all to fear monger about people who generally have a common interest with the rest of the left in a social context where the right wing is overwhelmingly more powerful. Just textbook wrecker behavior.
But we can’t talk about the “murder” because then that’s me being a debate bro, even as you tacitly admit to it being bullshit in the comments (Stalin not sending you enough bullets is not the same as shooting you, sorry!)
But we can’t talk about the “murder” because then that’s me being a debate bro
Yes, why do you think I owe you a discussion? Y’all are a bunch of entitled motherfuckers. Just calle me a “radlib” in your dunk tank and it’s good no?
Owe, owe, owe. You keep using that word, but I don’t think I have. My argument is not that you owe anything, it’s that if we are to pretend you are acting in good-faith, then there must be a healthy way for disagreement to exist (see you model the opposite in your title, how those dang tankies hate dissent). What I dislike is parading around completely fatuous claims and treating objections as pathological.
I fucking let you mother truckers run amok in my space to disagree like a bunch of toxic monkeys. If that’s not leaving space for “healthy disagreement” I don’t know what is!
But that’s not enough is it? No if you don’t debate me specifically it’s not enough.
I didn’t fling anything, y’all came to my place, remember? Also stop acting like a “debate me, bro” already! You won’t goad me 😁
It’s just despicable playing these precious little rhetorical games while using historical deaths (and one or two inventions) as props for your atrocity propaganda, all to fear monger about people who generally have a common interest with the rest of the left in a social context where the right wing is overwhelmingly more powerful. Just textbook wrecker behavior.
Man why would I ever ally with a scumbag like you? You turned into a toxic sludge the moment I didn’t indulge your sealioning.
The best part about this meme is seeing so many of you go full masks off publicly
“The tankie was rude to me when I accused him of having an ideology of senseless murder, his rudeness proves we shouldn’t have a political coalition”
And the murder too
But we can’t talk about the “murder” because then that’s me being a debate bro, even as you tacitly admit to it being bullshit in the comments (Stalin not sending you enough bullets is not the same as shooting you, sorry!)
Yes, why do you think I owe you a discussion? Y’all are a bunch of entitled motherfuckers. Just calle me a “radlib” in your dunk tank and it’s good no?
There’s a reason why the term sealion exists.
Owe, owe, owe. You keep using that word, but I don’t think I have. My argument is not that you owe anything, it’s that if we are to pretend you are acting in good-faith, then there must be a healthy way for disagreement to exist (see you model the opposite in your title, how those dang tankies hate dissent). What I dislike is parading around completely fatuous claims and treating objections as pathological.
I fucking let you mother truckers run amok in my space to disagree like a bunch of toxic monkeys. If that’s not leaving space for “healthy disagreement” I don’t know what is!
But that’s not enough is it? No if you don’t debate me specifically it’s not enough.