Women’s suffrage would not be introduced in Liechtenstein until 1984.

  • Nix@merv.news
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    How many women voted while accompanied by their husband though. I feel like a lot of them could have voted no under pressure

    • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Do you really look at the world today and have a hard time believing people would willingly vote against their interests?

    • HomebrewHedonist@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Misogyny becomes so normalized and institutionalized in a culture that even women sometimes do things and vote against their own best interests. It wouldn’t surprise me if there were a surprisingly high number of women who voted no.

      Case in point, how many Christian conservative women vote against a women’s right to chose whether to carry a child to full term?

    • flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      In my experience a lot of women (especially in patriarchal societies) support the idea of gender roles. And they are more than willing to apply violence to keep dissenting women (and men) in line.

      Being against own interests is an old human quirk.

    • heeplr@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      How would the husband check? Voting is strictly secret punishable by law. It’s next to impossible to check what your wife actually put on the ballot. For a reason…

      • Nix@merv.news
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I doubt they were enforcing men not checking on what their wives voted on before it was even legal for women to vote

        • heeplr@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Of course they did. Did you ever vote?

          How do you think that goes? “Hey you! Only one per booth! Oh, it’s a man. Is it your husband? Oh, I see your marriage certificate. Then it’s all fine.” for millions of couples? Come on…

          You might want to check your facts.

            • heeplr@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              It doesn’t need to be constitutional, a simple law is enough.

              Sure, if this was some kind of joke poll ignoring the most basic rules of democratic voting, I’ll stand corrected.

              • I mean of course it doesn’t need to be a constitutional law, that was just the most basic of Liechtensteinian law I could quickly find (and many countries have it there, e.g. France). But it’s unwise to assume that the secret ballot is such a given in a voting process. Nigeria has open ballots iirc, and even the US does not technically have a system that guarantees a proper secret ballot (as mail-in votes technically don’t meet the criteria).

                • heeplr@feddit.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Nigeria

                  It’s not a democratic process then by definition.

                  mail-in votes technically don’t meet the criteria

                  Now that’s a valid point. But how bold to assume, the vote was lost because men forced their women to use mail-in. In reality, reasons are much more complex.