• Mongostein@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    100%

    So much so that I’m at the point where I’m wondering if this show is still canon.

    I really like Strange New Worlds. The episodic nature with overarching storylines is the right direction for Star Trek, but really wish they had used this cast to make a show with a new crew in a new ship set post-DS9.

    • Madison_rogue@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      I disagree. I really enjoy this show and I can give the writers some creative license as a prequel for a show that’s almost sixty years old.

      Spock has to have a moment of crisis that brings him to the state of character he’s in in TOS. I think there’s plenty of room to breathe over the course of the show to allow that. I haven’t watched The Cage in several years, so I don’t exactly recall, however from what I do recall, Spock shows a lot more emotion in the pilot vs. the beginning of the series with Kirk.

      • Mongostein@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sure, but they could do literally the exact same show but set further in the future.

        When they brought Star Trek back in the 90s we got three great shows that all did their own thing while making callbacks to - but not relying on - the original series.

        All of the new shows rely way too much on nostalgia and I just wish they’d move on.

        • Madison_rogue@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          It seems that fan feedback is one of the reasons SNW exists. Which is fine; fan write-in campaigns and petitions are central to Star Trek.

          I do agree that a series outside TOS would be enjoyable, however that doesn’t seem to be in development right now (actually nothing is really in development right now). More than likely, I wouldn’t be surprised if Paramount pushed Star Trek: Legacy as a series after reception to the finale of Picard.

      • FormerGameDev@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        yea, I think this really does just fill in his arc, where he’s still learning how to be the Logical Vulcan, and he pushes farther and farther until you get to where he was in TMP, at the complete opposite, attempting to completely abandon all emotion.

        Then the rest of his arc after TMP is finding the balance.

      • JWBananas@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Spock has to have a moment of crisis that brings him to the state of character he’s in in TOS.

        This. It’s literally what we saw happen in DIS to get him from what we see in The Cage to what we see in SNW. There is no reason it can’t happen again.

    • concrete_baby
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Spock in SNW brings his portrayal in The Cage in alignment with the rest of TOS. In that episode, he smiles and has a more relaxed demeanor. If you watch TOS again, Leonard Nimoy plays Spock as oblivious to human emotional expression without being robotic. I actually find Ethan Peck’s portrayal to be more rigid than Nimoy’s. The Peck Spock tends to either suppress his emotion to the degree that he can appear monotonous and stiff, or fail to suppress emotions and experience outbursts. Around 10 years later, the Spock in TOS finds a balance and seems to have found a balance between emotional expression (including sarcasm and low-key passive aggressiveness against Dr. McCoy) and logic. That’s good character development imo

      Edit: Not to mention Spock’s final words in the 2009 movie where he tells his alternate self not to think too hard about logic and do what feels right. That’s Spock’s arc ends and resolves his internal conflict that lasted over decades.

    • doleo@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I largely agree with that idea. It feels like at some point Trek will need to let go of all old characters, to ensure its long-term viability. Personally, I’d be happy to get to know a new group (crew) of characters, even if they’re not a famous character’s offspring. I guess that was the idea with Discovery, but the universe/story arcs that they created didn’t interest me too much.

      I know that’s not really how shows work, people get enamored with the cast and roles, but I’d love to see a semi-regular shift in crew or ship, while the writers tackle the issues of the day allegorically.

      • Mongostein@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You know, I really tried to like Discovery, but then they tried to be a prequel and a sequel and I just couldn’t do it.

        Another Spock sibling we’ve never heard of? 🙄

        Strange New Worlds is great, I’d just really like them to stop relying on the nostalgia.

        • doleo@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yep, I think so, too. I suppose it’s just reflective of the time that it’s made in; so much of film and TV (and games) is just re-boots, pre/sequels, remasters and remakes. It’s like it’s too big a risk, to try an stray too far from a perceived existing audience.

          The point I dwell on for longer is the need for humour to be so prevalent in what is essentially a drama series. I keep repeating this in various threads, but I don’t like how often it’s used and how weak it is. I guess I’d rather watch something that’s Hornblower, rather than Family Guy.