• mindbleach
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is a testable hypothesis.

    Make up some new game - doesn’t have to be good or terribly unique, just novel enough to have negligible prior art - and see if the robot does the thing.

      • mindbleach
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m not the one playing ‘AI is whatever hasn’t been done.’

        I’m thoroughly familiar with how these technologies work and their present shortcomings. This guy is joking when he says programming is over. But it doesn’t take a diehard fanboy to acknowledge that this was impossible a year ago, and is getting more democratized as it gets more capable, and it is getting more and more capable.

        • nanoUFOM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          democratized as it gets

          Eh openAI and co would really rather this be regulated very very hard and for all training data to not be accessibly anymore like it was in the past.

          • mindbleach
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            They can try.

            Not like a corpus of published text is big data or privately held.

            Not like anyone training porn robots on booru tags gives a shit about copyright.

            Not like any model that’s been released can be put back in the bottle.

            OpenAI is struggling right now because they’ve realized they can’t afford to be centralized and they can’t compete at being decentralized. If big-iron approaches are truly more capable - they lose to Google. If advancements keep coming from rando engineers dropping whitepapers with stupid acronyms - they lose to everybody.

            Personally, I’m betting on a grab-bag of Asian surnames and LLaLLeLLuLLemon.