• MumboJumbo@lemmy.worldEnglish
      61·
      1 year ago

      I agree! I can’t wait to hear the cause of RUD though. Was it really FTS or was it damage from the hot staging?

      • xvlc@feddit.deEnglish
        61·
        1 year ago

        Scott Manley conjectures that the staging itself worked as intended, but the flip maneuver caused too much stress on the internal plumbing (with all the propellant sloshing around), resulting in a ruptured pipe and burning in the base of the booster.

      • threelonmusketeersMEnglish
        51·
        1 year ago

        From the SpaceX overlay graphic, it seems like a number of engines went out shortly after the relight for the boostback burn, around T+02:53. Asymmetric thrust and loss of control might have triggered the FTS.

        • MumboJumbo@lemmy.worldEnglish
          61·
          1 year ago

          Good catch. I was so focused on Starship and it’s engines. I guess the question now is whether it was because of the engines or or tank pressure?

  • gumnut@aussie.zoneEnglish
    3·
    1 year ago

    Interesting. I’m not sure give many raptors are supposed to relight on the boostback, but it looks like one of the gimbal raptors and several of the inner ring failed to relight for boostback. That would explain the trajectory deviation and FTS activation. Nice to see the improved FTS did its job anyway!