How can i9-14900 be 10% better than i9-13900 on some benchmarks, even though the clock speed increase is just 0.2/5.8~=3% and the architecture is the same?
How can i9-14900 be 10% better than i9-13900 on some benchmarks, even though the clock speed increase is just 0.2/5.8~=3% and the architecture is the same?
Dodgy reviews/testing. Hardware unboxed/GamersNexus show the 13900k/14900k within 1-3% of eachother.
My 14900k does 40k in cinebench r23 on 240W powerlimit :P Aint no 13900k coming remotely close to that.