• Unpigged@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can we theorize a situation where an average Argentinian voter consciously chooses a short term crisis with the prospect of normalization over a lifetime stagnation and decay? Argentina’s economy was shit for a long time, and maybe people’s intent is to wreck things for a change?

    • Corkyskog
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      People forget accelerationists exist… I doubt Trump would have won without them.

      • SheDiceToday@eslemmy.es
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I know they’re out there, but there can’t be a significant enough bloc of them to swing things. I’ve never encountered one outside of the internet, and even on the internet they mostly seem to be acting facetiously.

        • Corkyskog
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I know tons of them IRL. They just said things like this country is already shit? What’s the worse thing that happens, Trump burns everything down? That’s what we need to happen anyway to move forward.

          I have heard that sentiment a lot.

    • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Do you have any evidence that a significant number of voters have ever voted for short-term harm to enable some hypothetical future benefit?

      • snake_case_guy@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        2015 elections. Actually, 2015 elections are a better example than this. Argentina wasn’t half as bad as now. And people in the most important place (Conurban region) view for the change, because there was a solution that was not peronism. Unfortunately, Macri let everyone down with his gradualism strategy, instead of a shock strategy. That’s why the peronism came back.

        I’m simplifying a lot of stuff, there are other reasons for everything. Like Cristina’s legal issues, the kirchnerist party corruption, and the sort. In the same vein, Macri’s lack of boldness in some cases created a crisis of its own.