And what specifically makes it special, appealing, or interesting to you?

  • TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.orgM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Huh, I was under the impression there was a bit of a “boomer shooter” renaissance going on the last few years. I know I’ve seen a bunch of games that were trying to emulate the feel and sometimes even the look of that style of FPS.

    • setsneedtofeed@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      The definitions of arena shooters and boomer shooters are both pretty fuzzy and have a lot of overlap.

      For example, I consider Duke Nukem 3D’s multiplayer to be a great arena shooter, however when many people talk about arena shooters what they mean are early 2000s style shooters that are fully 3D rather than sprite based. Halo CE was “the” arena shooter when it came out.

      It is a genre that really hasn’t made a comeback. Some people say things like Overwatch are arena shooters, but for the kinds of people wanting old fashioned shooters a big element is that all players start with the same weapons and abilities by default. It’s the imperfection of language trying to articulate a feeling.

        • SveetPickle@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Oh, OK! I should have been more specific that I was talking about multiplayer games like what I mentioned, my bad! I knew about some of those games. The Doom Reboot and that Warhammer Boltgun are both sick, I’ve enjoyed both of them. I’ll be looking into the others thanks!

          • Helix 🧬@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            for multiplayer I liked Splitgate a lot, but the devs seem to have mostly abandoned it right when it came out of beta.

          • Pigeon@beehaw.orgOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            How does the Halo Infinite arena multiplayer differ from the original Halo? I never got to play the multiplayer modes in these older shooters.

            Is it that the older shooters had faster movement or simpler controls (easy to pick up, hard to master)? More like a Painkiller style of shooting? Or is that impression I have of older shooters totally off base?

            • SveetPickle@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I didn’t play much of the original three Halo games, I picked the series up when Reach came out, but yea movement and controls were simpler, there was no sprint or the special abilities they added in reach and afterwards like the jet pack and place down shield barriers. It was just you and your weapon against the other dude and their weapon.

              If memory serves the original halos actually felt slower in terms of movement and time to kill than the modern ones.

            • s900mhz@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Unreal was from what I remember is similar to painkiller. Imagine halo but jumping in slightly low gravity and you are always spirting.

            • WhoRoger@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Painkiller was definitely designed after the first Quake. As in, people who were playing Q1 for close to a decade because nothing else came close, loved Painkiller. If you were someone who just wanted to try out multi… Lol good luck, you lvl1 villager against lvl998 bosses.