• Throwaway@lemm.eeOPM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m torn. It’s the federal’s money to do with as they wish and it’s a fair stipulation, but highway infrastructure is not in a good state and adding stipulations when it’s not in a good state is just making it worse.

    • spacecowboy
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Right? Isn’t that a simple solution?

      Fix the infrastructure in accordance with “the green stipulation” and the feds fund it. And it starts asap. Then the roads are fixed AND it’s done in a way that doesn’t make our climate issues worse.

      Everyone wins.

      Why not support this?

      • Throwaway@lemm.eeOPM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Just takes more time and money, but yeah. Now that I’ve thought about it for a few days, it makes sense.

    • spacecowboy
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      The only thing stopping it from being done is the current state government, though. The money is there as long as they do it the proper way.