• Ookami38
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think the broader point is that, if crime is a social construct, it’s not natural and unchanging, we can redefine what crime is.

    • foofy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Did anyone think we couldn’t? We regularly elect people to do that job.

      • Ookami38
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, actually. A lot of people have a “well, what can you do” attitude about our lots in life.

      • Jtotheb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, and it’s silly to act like you don’t know of people who care a lot about following the law, thank cops for protecting us, look down on migrants for not doing it the right way, condemn people who steal to make ends meet because theft is a crime, yet don’t care much about the policies that leave our fellow humans on the street to fend for themselves that are immoral, but not criminal.

    • deikoepfiges_dreirad@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s still not a point at all, just like saying “maybe political change would be good”. Like, of course there are incidents where common sense morality and legal practice don’t match, that’s where lawmakers should step in and change something.

      • Ookami38
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, and the point of this is to remind people that’s an option. A lot of people get stuck in “life is how it is” and change seems impossible. It’s important to be reminded sometimes that it’s not.