• Tavarin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yes it is, unless you think Israel doesn’t have a right to protect it’s citizens and you’re okay with genocide against the Israeli Jews.

    • rambaroo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Israel is one of the wealthiest countries in the world. They are not at any serious risk of genocide and they don’t need our money to keep killing Palestinians. It’s the Palestinians who need help preventing genocide, not fucking Israel.

      • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        They do need help, they can;t afford the Iron Dome without aid, and without the Iron Dome Israeli casualties would have been drastically higher.

        Why do you support genocide of Israelis?

    • winterayars
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Of course Israel has a right to defend its people. Of course, it failed to do that on October 7. Still, i can’t argue that most people consider this kind of revenge to be also a component of self defense. Certainly that was true, for example, with the US’s war in Afghanistan.

      However, speaking of genocide, Hamas (hell, all of Palestine) is not in a position to seriously threaten the Israeli people as a whole nor the Israeli Jews specifically.

      Nor does this mean the US in particular is required to unconditionally provide an unlimited number of weapons to Israel.

      • xzite@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Still, i can’t argue that most people consider this kind of revenge to be also a component of self defense.

        Why did the bell ring immediately after Hamas started losing? You don’t get to perform an offensive, have less success than expected and then simply call off the war.

        However, speaking of genocide, Hamas (hell, all of Palestine) is not in a position to seriously threaten the Israeli people as a whole nor the Israeli Jews specifically.

        The Arab states have been trying to do this literally since the creation of Israel. The only reason it hasn’t occurred yet is because they lost all the wars they started.

      • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        is required to unconditionally provide an unlimited number of weapons to Israel.

        Those weapons are the only reason Hamas is not in a position to seriously threaten the Israeli people. Without them Israel would be vastly less able to defend its civilians.

        You take away arms assistance to Israel without dealing with Hamas, and you will end up with many, many dead Israelis.

        • winterayars
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Those weapons are the only reason Hamas is not in a position to seriously threaten the Israeli people.

          Doubt it.

          “Those hospitals and refugee camps are soooo scary, if we hadn’t blown them up surely 10,000 Jews would have died!”

          • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Hamas fires thousands of rockets from those locations at Israeli cities. Without the Iron Dome many Israeli civilians would have died.

            You are advocating for a genocide of the Jews if you do not insist on both sides being disarmed.