The rulings in Maryland and Oregon come amid a shifting legal landscape in the wake of a Supreme Court decision that has imposed new limits on gun regulation.

In the wake of a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision last year that significantly limits what the government can do to restrict guns, states led by Democrats have scrambled to circumvent or test the limits of the ruling. A few have approved new gun restrictions. Oregon even passed a ballot initiative to ban high-capacity ammunition magazines.

But this week, supporters of the new gun measures suffered a pair of setbacks, underscoring the rippling effect of the court’s decision.

On Tuesday, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in Richmond, Va., ruled that a 10-year-old Maryland law related to licensing requirements for handguns was unconstitutional.

  • Whoresradish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I am more offended by them saying you have to be 21 years old. If you are old enough to be drafted for the military then you should be old enough to have a firearm. Same with the right to vote.

    • RGB3x3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      You should have to be older to be drafted (or get rid of the draft entirely, which is my opinion).

      Having the right to vote I don’t think should confer you automatic rights to own a firearm. Voting is a much more powerful right in the first place.

      Now, if you pay taxes on wages at all, you should be given the right to vote, such as working 16 year olds.