I haven’t been this excited for a ship in a while.

To me it completely replaces the MOLE, even for undercrewed operations, and potentially even for occasional solo use, since most of the functionality is centralised on the bridge, so you won’t have to run down ladders and elevators to reach the mining heads, plus they are on rails now so no need to swap back and forth to the pilot seat to make small adjustments. Of course, it really depends on how engineering gameplay impacts large ships with small/solo crews.

And 500+ scu of cargo? Crazy. It’s even got a tractor beam for loading/unloading.

For me it was an instant buy (well, upgrade). Anyone else?

  • WunderBliss@citizensgaming.comOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s definitely close enough in price to an Orion to raise that question.

    The Orion seems like the kind of ship you park in an asteroid belt and just go to town on, and have other ships come to it for support, like maybe a hull c come to collect the refined resources, maybe a herc or something to resupply, etc. so the Orion can keep nomming on asteroids.

    The arrastra though seems a bit more active, plays more like any other mining ship, just bigger and with a built in refinery so you don’t need to worry about quant timers, etc. which is more my style for sure.

    • Aurenkin
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah that’s true, in the announcement video they did mention the use cases were slightly different too and the Arrastra can also mine on planets.

      Anyway, after some long overdue fleet consolidation I CCUed to one for $60 which I think is worth it. Didn’t make the leap to the Orion.