• Rodeo@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I always thought this one was stupid because he doesn’t make the distinction between linear velocity and angular velocity. It’s only confusing because he has omitted necessary information.

      • Phrodo_00@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not really. He does say that they have the same revolutions per minute, which is angular velocity.

      • hstde@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Maybe the dad doesn’t fully understand it himself and has just accepted it as a fun little physics fact.

        • can
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m losing confidence that I understand it

          • Bizarroland@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Okay just imagine two circles. There is a point at the bottom of each circle where the circle touches a piece of paper.

            A line is drawn where that point is across the sheet as each circle makes one full rotation in 1 minutes time.

            Obviously, the line on the larger circle will be larger than the line on the smaller circle, even though they made the same rotation, so even though they have the same numbers of revolutions per minute, the larger circle is moving faster, so it’s velocity is faster at the same ratio as the diameter of the two circles.