• Stoneykins [any]@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think they are arguing that using disney stuff as training data would be the infringement, and if the logo showed up in generated images, that would be proof they did that.

    But I’m guessing because it is phrased weird if they meant that. Idk.

    • jamesravey@lemmy.nopro.be
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Seems like the lawyer thinks that AI models deliberately jumble the Disney logo rather than specific text/artifact/logo generation just being a weakness of these types of models. (He’s wrong, he’s attributing intent to something janky/buggy)

    • B0rax@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That is always a dumb argument. People are also „trained“ by watching at the logo. You want to remove the logo from the world?