Reddit was so American too, all the arguments and things seemed to be through their world view. The fediverse should allow much more diversity, and be a bit more multicultural

US (plus UK kinda): maximise shareholder value

Others: enjoy the human experience, community, family (bio or appropriated), novelty, contentment

Nope. It’s far too US-centric, both in content and cultural norms enforced by censorship. What’s really great about the fediverse is to be able to find not just niche content about “the outside world” but communities literally run under different cultural norms.

So? The beauty of the fediverse is if you don’t like the content, unsub and sub to more of the ones you do like

You need to adjust your thinking a tad. The instances are all separate servers / websites that have agreed to talk in a certain way, that happen to use identical software. So it’s like going to Amazon and creating an account and then going to Imgur and creating an account. No one cares that there are two identical usernames as it’s two entirely separate databases.

Where it gets more relevant to Lemmy is that your username has @instance.abc after it.

I think the devs openly stated they aren’t backend bods and asked for help optimising the database as a priority. There’s a bit of work going on on github to sort that out I think. Anyone reading this who can optimise postgresql or contribute to a database agnostic retool should probably speak to the devs as I imagine you’d be welcome.

I wish I could help so much but I doubt they’re going to retool into .net haha.

The short version is that beehaw was struggling with the (currently) limited toolset available to moderate user content, and they saw a heap of users posting things they don’t allow on their instance were coming from the two other big instances, so it was more effective for them to defederate to try and stem the tide.

I imagine regeneration will occur in future when the lemmyverse stabilises a little, and when better mod tools are available

As the years have gone by, I cannot believe any government has the competence to stage something like this start to finish. However I believe they were much more likely quietly financing certain groups and putting ideas into their head. It could be as simple as saying “oh if some sort of hijacking occurred over us soil we would just have to spend out heaps on getting at the source of the trouble, hint hint” and al-qaeda going away and going “actually let’s see if we can really make this spectacular”

Yeah that was excellent! Thanks for sharing! Have an uplemmy.

Oh I didn’t mean blocking users, to me a user’s home instance is a matter of convenience and not a cross for them to bear as a member of some perceived village.

Lotus Notes

Do you mean an entire instance? Heaps of people are asking for this.

Blocking an individual community is trivial however, and can be done by opening the community sidebar and hitting block.

I imagine they are in damage control mode and are hoping to stem the outflow of users’ attention spans to the Lemmyverse while their current actions are the Current Thing.

I reckon they are budgeting for a 1-2 week martial law period to try and stabilise and will probably force open all the closed subs and make use of repost and chatGPT bots to simulate decent engagement, possibly even paying for comments too.

It would also be very interesting if they roll back on their censorship of open discussion of certain topics to attract back previously “resettled” users.

Currently the admins have to curate this for you through federation, although you can try and whack a mole individual communities from an instance. Heaps of people are asking for user level control of blocking instances and I hope it comes soon as there’s a couple instances I keep seeing federated into my feed that I find abhorrent, and this growth phase of Lemmy means new communities on those instances keep appearing.

On a related note, the stranger things tie in mobile game was about 300x better than it had any right to be

Yeah I’ve been asking for this feature too, imo it’s one of the necessary features for long term survival of Lemmy as a concept, users should not have to rely on instance admins to curate their experience in that way.

The best revenge is living well.

Actually I misunderstood the solution and it doesn’t meet my needs. I wanted to block an entire instance as a user. I actually don’t really care much for the admins managing this for me…

Yep it’s a huge issue, and the inverse case where instance Y’s admins take a bung from some product manufacturer or agenda lobby and overnight the content moderation policy changes. There’s no point getting comfy with your account right now until user migration is lightweight, frictionless and doable after a ban, to reduce the cost to a user of a changing relationship with the admins of an instance.

It’s baffling how having a home instance makes you subject to the whims of the instance admins ref. banning your user across the lemmyverse or deciding what you will and won’t see by their Federation choices. It’s like, I despised Reddit for its blanket censorship and statistical-minority rule, and Lemmy has chosen to kind of replicate that?

I’d much rather my user profile and preferences, feed settings just be a lightweight, mobile or transient thing that can be moved around as the nature of each instance changes, with admins just housing an agreed number of users as part of the “cost” of being a Lemmy instance, and not having any pastoral role in their governance.