Are_Euclidding_Me [e/em/eir]

  • 0 Posts
  • 45 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: May 1st, 2023

help-circle




  • First of all, your comment is pretty ableist.

    Second of all, these two distinct meanings you’re seeing aren’t so distinct, so I don’t at all think it’s a misunderstanding.

    For an example that sits right between the two meanings you see as distinct, we can look at my struggle to finish my PhD. I should have quit 4 years ago with a master’s. I’d be in a much better spot economically, mentally, emotionally, basically in every way that matters. Sure, finishing my PhD was not as bad as staying in an abusive relationship or smoking a ton or partying way too hard way too often, but it’s closer to that than someone who believes “quitters never win” would like to admit. There are lots of times when it’s a way better idea to just quit while you’re ahead and do something more worthwhile that will actually make your life better rather than stick with something awful just because you don’t want to be a loser and quit.


  • Ok, I think I see. For people who use it frequently, an instant pot is actually easier than other options. For me it’s very much an arcane piece of equipment that makes me nervous every time I touch it. I think I’ll stick to pots and rice cookers. I’ve never had beans boil over (I use a giant pot) and my rice cooker is amazing. For setting and forgetting reasons I can just use a crock pot (which takes forever, sure, but I’m fine with that).

    Thanks for answering my questions! And for posting your delicious looking meals all the time, I love looking at them!



  • I have a few questions about instant pots, because people love them, but I just can’t figure out why I’d want to use one. Maybe someone reading this can help!

    So, ok, instant pots can cook beans quicker. But I have no idea how you decide how long to put the beans in for! And every time I’ve tried I’ve ended up with crunchy beans, so I have to restart the whole instant pot process and basically cook the beans twice, which ends up not being that much quicker than just doing them in a pot on the stove. How do you get the time right the first time so you don’t have to cook the beans twice? Do you just way overestimate the time since beans can’t really get overcooked?

    Second, I recently tried to make some rice in the instant pot, using the usual ratio of rice to water that I normally would. It was terrible! Just wet and mushy and awful. What is the correct grain to water ratio for an instant pot? Not just rice, but like, say I wanted to make barley, or any other grain. In a rice cooker you want to do 3 to 1 water to barley. How do you adjust water to grain ratios for an instant pot?

    And third, this picture has me confused. Why would anyone ever cook pasta in an instant pot? Isn’t that going to be way slower than on the stove? Because the instant pot has to pressurize and then de-pressurize? What am I missing?

    Basically, someone who likes instant pots, please instant-pot-pill me. People swear by these things, but in my mind they’re entirely useless to downright worse than other cooking methods. What is it about instant pots that makes them good, because I literally do not understand.

    Thanks!



  • support some form of ranked voting in your state next time

    Serious question: how do you suggest I do this? The “vote for Biden” people say this a lot, and like, I agree, ranked choice voting would be far preferable to our current electoral system. I’d like this change to happen. So how can we make it happen? What is the plan for after the election to get ranked voting before the next one? So far as I can tell, none of the politicians in my state (or any state, really) have tried to implement ranked choice and there aren’t any ballot initiatives that aim towards it. So what do you see as the way forward here? How do we get ranked choice voting to become a reality before the next time we’re faced with a choice between two absolutely unacceptable presidential candidates?


  • I can think of a couple of uses. Well, basically just one use. You could hide posts that cause distress for whatever reason. For example, I hate snakes and if someone posted a neat picture of a snake I’d probably hide it, just so I don’t have to keep seeing the same post and jump scaring myself with a picture of a snake while scrolling. Another example might be a thread in which people are arguing and you don’t want to get dragged into the argument. I actually literally did this earlier today with a thread where people were yet again arguing about the upcoming US election and whether voting Biden is a reasonable choice. I’ve read this argument so many times and it’s so tempting to jump in and be an asshole to someone who is wrong and I just don’t want to do that today, so better to hide the post so I don’t keep seeing it while scrolling.

    So yeah, you can hide posts you don’t want to keep running across while scrolling for whatever reason. Seems like a pretty useful feature to me, I’m glad we have it now.





  • But what if we grow? What if more people pirate?

    Good. Unlimited piracy on media and software corporations.

    I’m a communist first and foremost. Private property is wrong in all its forms, this wrongness is just most obvious when talking about intellectual property, because intellectual property can be easily copied and isn’t something physical like the tools in a factory. Of course corporations will always try to clamp down on piracy, they’ve been trying to do so my entire adult life. It doesn’t really matter how many pirates there are, because corporations don’t just want money, they want all the money. If even one person pirates, corporations will try to make piracy difficult.

    I guess I fundamentally disagree with your statement that “The world can handle a stable population of pirates.” I don’t think that’s a meaningful statement. It’s not like there’s some “carrying capacity” for piracy after which point the intellectual property ecosystem will tip out of equilibrium and cause pirates to become an endangered species.



  • I love lemmy, having been here since the very earliest hexbear days. In my view, the devs are doing the best they can. They’re a tiny team surviving on grants, trying to produce software that the users, for some reason, expect to have feature parity with reddit, a large corporation with a large paid dev team. It’s weird to say the least.

    My understanding is that nutomic and dessalines survive solely on that 4000 euros per month, because all of their time goes to lemmy. How do you want them to survive? They need to eat and pay rent, you know. The real world exists and they’re humans in it, needing food and sleep and shelter.

    It seems to me you want magic. You don’t want the lemmy devs to be humans, you want them to be magic coder gods who are infinitely patient, with boundless time and energy. But that’s completely unrealistic, you surely must see that, right?




  • what, on the surface, is a pretty trivial ask

    I don’t think having my real life phone number tied to a website or game account is a trivial ask. I’d like my data to be private, especially something as real-life and tangible as a fucking phone number. Sure, there are ways around these things, you can get a fake phone number for cheap (or possibly even free), but that’s rather more effort than I’m willing to put in for most things. If I need to enter a phone number to sign up for an account for something, chances are very extremely good I’ll just decide I don’t need the account that badly. I don’t think I’m alone in this.