• 11 Posts
  • 2.12K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 24th, 2023

help-circle






  • So I actually read the article, even though there are huge outstanding questions on the nature of ownership, that’s actually not what the court argument is about:

    Replying to Ubisoft’s argument that the statute of limitations is up, the plaintiffs responded with their own photos of The Crew’s packaging, which states that the activation code for the game doesn’t expire until 2099; that’s an example of how Ubisoft “implied that [The Crew] would remain playable during this time and long thereafter,”

    Well yeah… software as a service is a thing but Ubisoft is straight up lying…

    My two cents: no one is expecting online services to be up forever, so imo the correct solution is open source the game after the company meets their 10 (or 20) year obligation which should be clearly pointed out during the initial rental agreement (shouldn’t call it purchase)






  • Grandwolf319toPolitical Memes@lemmy.worldsurely
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    It’s not all or nothing, another way to think of it is:

    How bad do things have to get for there to be an actual shift to making things better?

    I would love to make things better one step at a time, I think our system is a great starting point.

    But I ask myself the above question everytime things seem to be headed downward.

    Events like Luigi is what I mean by things getting bad enough for something to push back.


  • Grandwolf319toPolitical Memes@lemmy.worldsurely
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    While I agree in theory, it assumes the existing system has rational or somewhat rational actors.

    If your system is full of counter productive individuals, it might be easier to start fresh.

    This works better with groups and companies, entire countries, not so much.




  • Cause no one is stopping you from going to said instance and just having the discussion there.

    If there was this super important leak that needed to be out there, if it’s posted on a right wing instance that is a defederated ghost town, it’s still out there. People can link to it and leverage the instance to have the needed discussions.

    Censorship means removing access, defederation does not wipe it off of the Internet.





  • Not only that, I’ve tried pitching the fediverse to right wing people, but they didn’t bite.

    Even the crypto bros that were all about decentralization couldn’t see why a decentralized social media platform was superior.

    This also didn’t matter for people who care about “free speech”.

    You think the allure of being fully independent and having your own instance would be right up their alley given how they value independence, but nope.

    Seriously? Why isn’t there a right wing instance? My guess is that a right wing person can’t fathom owning something that benefits others which doesn’t give them back profit.